Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Mar 1998 15:27:33 -0800
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Robert Watson <robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org>
Cc:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <cschuber@uumail.gov.bc.ca>, gkshenaut@ucdavis.edu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: DEVFS (was Re: More problems with new slice code ) 
Message-ID:  <199803152327.PAA12471@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 15 Mar 1998 18:12:16 EST." <Pine.BSF.3.96.980315180626.3601D-100000@trojanhorse.pr.watson.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, 15 Mar 1998, Mike Smith wrote:
> > Having said that, it will indeed be possible to have device nodes 
> > appear in more than one place, and have different permissions etc. in 
> > those separate places, which is I think what you are getting at 
> > (chrooted environments, etc.)
> 
> This is, indeed, what I had in mind -- it might be desirable to have a
> chroot'd daemon have access to a device.  I was also wondering about
> NFS-exported devices, but with a devfs that is not really an issue.

There are a lot of useful things for which having a partially or 
fully-populated dev directory in a chroot environment is essential.  
NFS-exported devices are actually problematic with a number of systems 
just now where non-BSD hosts can't provide device major/minor numbers 
of adequate size.

> > If you're interested in getting a taste of this (and providing valuable
> > feedback early in the picture), there are patches for -current which
> > impement large portions of this already.  See 
> > http://www.freebsd.org/~julian for more.
> 
> I may give that a try on one of our -current test machines in a week or
> so -- the -current Coda port is underway, and seeing how /dev/cfs0 (the
> coda device for Vice<->Kernel communication) behaves dynamically would be
> useful.  Thanks for the information; this sounds like a great feature for
> reducing administrative load and preventing nasties :).

That's the general idea.  8)  It would be extremely good to have 
third-party developers that think that this may interact with their 
product looking at the basic ideas now, to make sure that we take your 
concerns into account at a stage where we can still make major changes.

-- 
\\  Sometimes you're ahead,       \\  Mike Smith
\\  sometimes you're behind.      \\  mike@smith.net.au
\\  The race is long, and in the  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\  end it's only with yourself.  \\  msmith@cdrom.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803152327.PAA12471>