Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 09:54:12 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ECGS ... Message-ID: <19981103095412.A12327@nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811030854270.19544-100000@thelab.hub.org>; from The Hermit Hacker on Tue, Nov 03, 1998 at 08:58:05AM -0400 References: <19981102220500.A12773@nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811030854270.19544-100000@thelab.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> but the last I've heard on the list is that v1.1.1 is about to be > released...is that not more stable then a 'development version'? That sounds like a good target for the EGCS port then. Any timeline? > From what I'm gathering, it looks like EGCS went super-strict on the > conformance side, and MICO might be doing something that the 1.1.x series Nothing wrong with adhearing to the ISO spec. The vast margarity of C++ compilers are so far from the ISO spec it is impossible to know what C++ really is these days. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.ucdavis.edu -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981103095412.A12327>