Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 15:32:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Mike Eldridge <diz@cafes.net> Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alpha 4.x releases (production quality?) Message-ID: <14832.40216.99351.889106@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010201400510.31245-100000@mail.cafes.net> References: <14832.37309.17357.558735@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010201400510.31245-100000@mail.cafes.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Eldridge writes: > > I've looked at various used alpha hardware dealers, but as I said before, > I don't know much about alphas. It seems there are LOADS of different > ones. > > AlphaStation 200, huh? Do they have no cache either? ;) They have a 512k cache. They're not fast, but they're not painfully slow either... They're considerably less buggy than multias. > Any suggestions on a (fairly) cheap alpha? (keep in mind I'm buying a new > car =P) > An alphastation 200 or 250. You can generally find them on the on-line auction sites for less than $300. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14832.40216.99351.889106>