Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Apr 1997 16:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>
To:        "Jay D. Nelson" <jdn@qiv.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Need help with disk tuning.
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.970422163328.24344f-100000@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970421190647.628A-100000@acp.qiv.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 21 Apr 1997, Jay D. Nelson wrote:

> I'm about to add a new Hawk to my system and would like to optimize all of
> my drives. Maybe I haven't R'ed enough of TFM. If so, please point me in
> the right direction.
> 
> The default disklabel defines a disk at 3600 RPM with an interleave of 1.
> Are these numbers _actually_ used? Can performance be boosted by defining
> rotational speed as 5400 (or whatever the drive is rated) with an
> interleave of 0?

I don't believe they are.  If you use the automatically created disklabel
it should work out fine.

> If I do this, I suspect I'm pushing the envelope (Tekram SCSI card on an
> ISA bus). Would I gain anything by increasing block and fragment size?
> Say 16k block and 2k fragment? Or -- what about a block size of a full
> cylinder with a fragment of 1/8th cylinder?

The defaults should be okay, unless you're running a news server.

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970422163328.24344f-100000>