Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:32:57 +0100 From: "Alexej Sokolov" <bsd.quest@googlemail.com> To: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel vm_submap's Message-ID: <671bb5fc0812040832x6ff884cbv805bddb3d1471671@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <a31046fc0812040625m29aaac4dlcb6bcd9de38a5e7b@mail.gmail.com> References: <671bb5fc0812040427n6ff9a88fy7bf1cdc6382db8db@mail.gmail.com> <a31046fc0812040625m29aaac4dlcb6bcd9de38a5e7b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2008/12/4 pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> > 2008/12/4 Alexej Sokolov <bsd.quest@googlemail.com>: > > Hello, > > Where/How can I get information about vm_submap's in the actual stable > > kernel: > > % uname -v > > FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p5 #0: Tue Oct 7 19:05:20 CEST 2008 > > And what kind of data is present in these submaps (mallocs, mbufs, > > DMA-buffer..)? > > > > vm_map_submap(9) might help you. > btw, it's called only from one place I can find: kmem_suballoc. Ok, then the next question: If I have some kernel virtual addres, what is the best way to find out which submap it belongs to? > > > > Thanks, > > -- > wbr, > pluknet >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?671bb5fc0812040832x6ff884cbv805bddb3d1471671>