Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 20:57:50 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: -current snapshots and xen kernels Message-ID: <d763ac660905150557p1f0bd391j84421e6516318d43@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905151021010.54211@fledge.watson.org> References: <d763ac660905142100h66f10b84yd4405de61513f2d2@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905151021010.54211@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/5/15 Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>: > This was discussed at the devsummit also, and struck many people as a goo= d > idea. =A0The usual tension, however, is over the amount of free space on = the > ISO. =A0It might be time to drop the UP kernel from our install CD and re= place > it with a Xen kernel, and add an install-time option to select the kernel= ? Well initially I don't know how you'd use the domU kernel inside an actual domain so I don't see why you'd throw it in sysinstall just for now. Just leave it on the snapshot CD so people like me can manually create basic VM images (which is easy under FreeBSD - install kernel and base tardist in a new filesystem using "install.sh"; boot it) and it should lower the barrier for bootstrapping a DomU VM. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d763ac660905150557p1f0bd391j84421e6516318d43>