Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:09:14 +0200 From: Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o Message-ID: <CA%2BD9QhtguO8gEY2gbyHA=vJ64ZuQnfT%2BzF6WykSDN-j23ZOjeQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208080918390.3359@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <793d6519ca3648de7634faff1829b9f7@remailer.privacy.at> <5021641E.4030206@une.net.co> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208072309370.1652@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <5022104D.8070402@infracaninophile.co.uk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208080918390.3359@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Wojciech Puchar < wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > Needing fsck because the drive is failing and not able to store and >> retrieve data reliably any more is a whole different thing. >> > > or bad data stored because of non-disk errors. > > > in this case any filesystem will store the wrong data. This has little to do with ZFS. Beside in production one should run with ECC memory to eliminate the possibility of incorrect data from memory
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BD9QhtguO8gEY2gbyHA=vJ64ZuQnfT%2BzF6WykSDN-j23ZOjeQ>