Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 8 Jun 2003 09:23:59 +0900
From:      KATO Tsuguru <tkato@prontomail.com>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc:        naddy@mips.inka.de
Subject:   Re: ghostscript commits (fix of back out request)
Message-ID:  <20030608092359.511b962a.tkato@prontomail.com>
In-Reply-To: <bbtqo8$1f0p$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
References:  <20030607211633.GA78779@freefall.freebsd.org> <bbtqo8$1f0p$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 22:59:20 +0000 (UTC)
naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:

> Alexander Kabaev <kan@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote:
> 
> > your recent commits to ghostscript port have broken them for
> > users which legitimately use GS_OPTIONS environment variable 
> > to pass default options to the gs binary. script/configure
> > scripts in ports abuse this variable for something absolutely
> > unrelated, i.e. the list of drivers to compile with the port.
> 
> The updates/changes are not mine but were submitted by Tsuguru KATO
> <tkato@prontomail.com>.  I can only perform very minimal testing
> of gs's functionality.

Ah, yes. That's just my mistake. I'm verry sorry.

Latest patch in ports/52479 (for ghostscript-afpl) and
ports/52480 (for ghostscript-gnu) contains fix for this
issue by replacing GS_OPTIONS in scripts/configure with
GS_DRIVERS_LIST.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030608092359.511b962a.tkato>