Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:20:07 +0100
From:      Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>
To:        Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Timidity++ needs libarc as run dependency ??
Message-ID:  <30953625-3a12-4514-6309-62fc91dea780@selasky.org>
In-Reply-To: <e4e8eef2-367a-da6e-0b1f-b1e41719731b@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <2f68ffd8-d1f5-7c29-2703-2327187c1069@selasky.org> <e4e8eef2-367a-da6e-0b1f-b1e41719731b@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2020-02-26 13:18, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
> On 2/26/20 10:55 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libarc.so.1" not found, required by 
>> "timidity"
>>
>> pkg install libarc
> 
> It looks like libarc is already included in LIB_DEPENDS. It is not 
> included in the timidity++ package. It is only included with the 
> timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages (like timidity++-emacs).
> 
> I've never used timidity myself, so I am not sure why this is this way.
> 
> Is there a reason why you installed timidity++ instead of one of the 
> timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages?
> 

No specific reason. I just wanted to test some MIDI files.

And did "pkg instal xxx". Is timidity++ not a valid port/package?

--HPS




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?30953625-3a12-4514-6309-62fc91dea780>