Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:45:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Paul Pathiakis <pathiaki2@yahoo.com> To: FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org> Subject: Re: About wayland Message-ID: <1752452512.854228.1587559555782@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <f7b74683-11a4-22cd-5c36-e7476eaf3d86@qeng-ho.org> References: <20200421175910.GB62660@mithril.foucry.net> <2374cb33-48f6-4bac-54ca-ca8aedd4650f@list.199903.xyz> <f7b74683-11a4-22cd-5c36-e7476eaf3d86@qeng-ho.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm just throwing this out there..... It's created under the MIT license. In Massachusetts, there are two adjoining towns.... Wayland and Weston....= =C2=A0 Wayland is the infrastructure and Weston is the compositor. Could be? Paul On Wednesday, April 22, 2020, 7:40:04 AM EDT, Arthur Chance <freebsd@qe= ng-ho.org> wrote: =20 =20 On 22/04/2020 01:22, Philip wrote: > Just curious, who is Wayland? a people name? I have a vague recollection it was named after Wayland the Smith (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayland_the_Smith). --=20 Fat Earther: One who believes the world is round but has put on too much weight round the middle. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 22 15:00:18 2020 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B472B723B for <freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 15:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail.inka.de (mail.inka.de [IPv6:2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 496kBQ28cDz4MJ7 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 15:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mips.inka.de (news@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1jRGqx-00032s-It; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:59:55 +0200 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 03MEtg0F071332 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:55:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from news@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from news@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 03MEtgTr071331 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:55:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from news) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> Newsgroups: list.freebsd.questions Subject: Re: find(1) removes as it should a directory, but after this it complains about Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:55:42 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <slrnra0mne.2527.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> References: <20200420081627.GA30229@sh4-5.1blu.de> User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 496kBQ28cDz4MJ7 X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of news@mips.inka.de has no SPF policy when checking 2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c) smtp.mailfrom=news@mips.inka.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.63 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.990,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.998,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[inka.de]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:202113, ipnet:2a04:c9c7::/32, country:DE]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de]; IP_SCORE(0.44)[ip: (1.17), ipnet: 2a04:c9c7::/32(0.59), asn: 202113(0.47), country: DE(-0.02)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 15:00:18 -0000 On 2020-04-20, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote: > I've stumbled over something with find(1) which I would call a bug: > > $ mkdir foo > $ find foo -type d -execdir rm -rv {} \; > foo > find: foo: No such file or directory find(1)... * sees the directory entry "foo"; * evalutes the expression for it, which as a side effect executes an action; * tries to recurse into "foo", since it is a directory. That's perfectly reasonable. find(1) can't know that the action removed the directory. If your exec removes a directory, you should tell find(1) to not recurse into it: $ find foo -type d -prune -execdir rm -rv {} \; -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1752452512.854228.1587559555782>