Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 15:24:31 +0200 From: Gleb Kurtsou <gleb.kurtsou@gmail.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Replacing FNV and hash32 with Paul Hsieh's SuperFastHash Message-ID: <20101226132431.GA16490@tops> In-Reply-To: <if5gmr$a5r$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <20101223224619.GA21984@tops> <if5gmr$a5r$1@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (25/12/2010 20:29), Ivan Voras wrote: > On 23.12.2010 23:46, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > > > For testing I've used dbench with 16 processes on 1 Gb swap back md > > device, UFS + SoftUpdates: > > Old hash (Mb/s): 599.94 600.096 599.536 > > SFH hash (Mb/s): 612.439 612.341 609.673 > > > > It's just ~1% improvement, but dbench is not a VFS metadata intensive > > benchmark. Subjectively it feels faster accessing maildir mailboxes > > with ~10.000 messages : ) > > Try blogbench if you need metadata-intensive operations, or even fsx. blogbench should be good, but I've always had hard time interpreting its results. Besides results tend to very a lot, there is no way to set seed value like in fsx, so that I could run exactly the same test in different configurations. I prefer to use blogbench for stability testing. fsx is a different beast, it reads/writes/truncates at random offsets - great tool for debugging mmap/truncate issues. Patch doesn't improve it in any way. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101226132431.GA16490>