Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:24:27 +0100
From:      krad <kraduk@gmail.com>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Improving old-fashioned UFS2 performance with lots of inodes...
Message-ID:  <CALfReyd8Mt0YSGCbrsU3yCS%2BKLaC5aRpiyz1hh%2BAiwS-cJiaoQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <iv1doe$3v9$1@dough.gmane.org>
References:  <1309217450.43651.YahooMailRC@web120014.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20110628010822.GA41399@icarus.home.lan> <1309302840.88674.YahooMailRC@web120004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20110628234723.GA63965@icarus.home.lan> <iv1doe$3v9$1@dough.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6 July 2011 11:34, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 29/06/2011 01:47, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
>  unfortunately, so for now we will use UFS2, and as I said ... it seems a
>>> shame
>>> that UFS2 cannot use system RAM for any good purpose...
>>>
>>> Or can it ?  Anyone ?
>>>
>>
>> Like I said: the only person (I know of) who could answer this would be
>> Kirk McKusick.  I'm not well-versed in the inner workings and design of
>> filesystems; Kirk would be.  I'm not sure who else "knows" UFS around
>> here.
>>
>
> UFS will use all your memory for caching, there's no known issues here. Of
> course, you still need to read all this data in to be cached.
>
> As Jeremy said, even ZFS will not help you with huge file systems without
> some work. You could read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Sharding<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharding>and simply replace "databases" with "file systems" and "tables" with
> "directories" :)
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs<http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>;
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@**freebsd.org<freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
> "
>


Sorry if i misread this but are you saying you are having memory issues with
rsync? If so what version are you using?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALfReyd8Mt0YSGCbrsU3yCS%2BKLaC5aRpiyz1hh%2BAiwS-cJiaoQ>