Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:13:34 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org, kmacy@freebsd.org, Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v Message-ID: <200906170813.34660.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <k%2B9khAZnafPFfFU0wKmc9RlPP/Y@j4OYE6OL8eALCd4BvSxIfwgoxSc> References: <20090602222445.2F6017302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <Rj7Fi0Uz71tB6gaY5wX5iV4Wqak@XX1fo6zQUfC4h0jjRC6IBz3oNH4> <k%2B9khAZnafPFfFU0wKmc9RlPP/Y@j4OYE6OL8eALCd4BvSxIfwgoxSc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 12:26:27 am Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > John, good day. > > Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:29:56AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 08:02:25AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Wednesday 03 June 2009 11:26:17 pm Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > > > Yes, seems like so. John, may be we can eliminate the only reference to > > > > KTR_PERCPU from sys/sys/pcpu.h? Both 'struct pcpu' fields seem to be > > > > unused (grep'ped -CURRENT sources). > > > > > > Yes. > > > > Fine. Then the attached patch should remove the stuff. > > Could the mentioned KTR_PERCPU stuff be removed or you think that > it is better to leave it "as is"? I removed it from HEAD already after your previous e-mail (at least from <sys/pcpu.h>). Was there something else you had in mind? -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200906170813.34660.jhb>