Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 08:37:12 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Bug in #! processing - One More Time Message-ID: <42898308.2020704@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <p06210226beaf1a0424f7@[128.113.24.47]> References: <200410020349.i923nG8v021675@northstar.hetzel.org> <20041002052856.GE17792@nexus.dglawrence.com> <p0611041fbd848f6aa55d@[128.113.24.47]> <20041002233542.GL714@nexus.dglawrence.com> <p0620076ebe2490ccdc00@[128.113.24.47]> <p06210225be4307a39100@[128.113.24.47]> <421DAD8F.6000704@portaone.com> <p0621024bbe482b50f150@[128.113.24.47]> <4284D038.50805@FreeBSD.org> <p0621020dbeaa836cd61a@[128.113.24.47]> <4284D4BC.9070705@FreeBSD.org> <p0621020fbeaa86c39e7d@[128.113.24.47]> <p06210226beaf1a0424f7@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 12:45 PM -0400 5/13/05, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > >> >> Note that I'm not just "running this through buildworld". That's >> how all the previous changes were tested, too. I have a whole >> battery of tests that I've been slogging through. > > > Scanning through /usr/src, the following scripts *might* have problems > with this change we agreed on, depending on how they are used: > > ./contrib/ipfilter/rules/BASIC.NAT=: > #!/sbin/ipnat -f - > ./contrib/ipfilter/rules/BASIC_1.FW: > #!/sbin/ipf -f - > ./contrib/ipfilter/rules/BASIC_2.FW: > #!/sbin/ipf -f - > ./contrib/ntp/scripts/monitoring/ntptrap: > #!/local/bin/perl --*-perl-*- > ./sys/conf/makeLINT.sed: > #!/usr/bin/sed -E -n -f > ./tools/regression/ia64/unaligned/unaligned.t: > #!/usr/bin/env perl -w > ./tools/tools/backout_commit/backout_commit.rb: > #!/usr/bin/env ruby -w > > I don't think any of these are serious, but it's nice to find them > ahead of the change instead of after the fact. I will probably be > out of town for Tuesday and part of Wednesday. And I imagine I'll > spend part of Thursday "in a galaxy far-far away", even though the > first two episodes were incredibly lame. But I do still expect to > commit the change sometime later this week, unless someone objects. > > But since this is change somewhat more disruptive than I initially > expected, I doubt I will MFC all of these changes into 5.x-stable. I've looked at them too. Actually "-f -" can be collapsed to the "-f-", while "-E -n -f" to the "-Enf". env(1) can be fixed to DTRT, so that nothing is really unfixable. -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42898308.2020704>