Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Dec 1999 10:47:06 +0100
From:      "Steffen Merkel" <d_f0rce@gmx.de>
To:        "Kip Macy" <kip@lyris.com>
Cc:        <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Kernel threads
Message-ID:  <002c01bf5118$84e701e0$0201a8c0@blade>
References:  <Pine.SOL.4.05.9912271014001.24487-100000@luna.lyris.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,

From: Kip Macy <kip@lyris.com>
To: Richard Seaman, Jr. <dick@tar.com>

> They may be preemptive, but I saw a lot of instances with Lyris where one
> thread could easily monopolize processor time at the expense of all
> others and I had to add sleeps in at places.

Does this mean I've got to add sleeps in my threads to let other threads get
cpu time? Is there no other possibility?

Steffen




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002c01bf5118$84e701e0$0201a8c0>