Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 14:59:06 +0200 From: Michael Grimm <trashcan@ellael.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4 Message-ID: <05DDCF70-8865-4F1F-A264-3000B8EF5244@ellael.org> In-Reply-To: <20160402124845.GM1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <6DD156C6-C3E1-43BC-8EC5-1ACB16EBFC3E@ellael.org> <20160402124845.GM1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: >> 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: [=E2=80=A6] >> 309 seconds for the very same 74 ports within the very same jail and = pkg-1.7.0: [=E2=80=A6] >> Is this an expected slow-down? /usr/ports/UPGRADE and = https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ports-mgmt/pkg/?view=3Dlog are not = indicating that behavior. >> But I might have missed something. >>=20 >> Any feedback is highly appriciated, thanks, and regards, >=20 > pkg 1.7 is IO intensive that may explain. Ok, understood. JFTR: perl (24s), python27 (44s), and ruby (125s) take the longest time = to reinstall. > I plan to readd some improvements on this side before 1.8 Good to know, thanks for your feedback. Regards, Michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?05DDCF70-8865-4F1F-A264-3000B8EF5244>