Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 00:30:35 +0200 From: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARM board recommendations with true GigE ports Message-ID: <07D27DD7-2434-4A2E-91CE-A05D12BBAC2A@netgate.com> In-Reply-To: <201709222206.QAA21968@mail.lariat.net> References: <201709222206.QAA21968@mail.lariat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What do you mean by =E2=80=9Ctrue gigabit=E2=80=9D? I=E2=80=99ve trivially done 939mbps over TCP / IPv4 (iperf3, even a browser-= based Speedtest) on a couple different Armada 38x boards with the default pf= Sense ruleset =E2=80=9Con=E2=80=9D. Solid-Run makes one, we sell one.=20 Hell, even the little single core 600MHz OMAP / 2 Ethernet router we sell wi= ll do 550mbps using pkt-gen without =E2=80=9Cpf=E2=80=9D running. loos@ did= a huge amount of work on the NIC driver there. Same SoC family as=20 Beaglebone, and BBB is 1GHz.=20 They won=E2=80=99t do 1.488Mpps though, that still wants an Intel box and ne= tmap-fwd. I do have the netmap code for the 38x though, so maybe soon... Jim > On Sep 23, 2017, at 12:06 AM, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net> wrote: >=20 > All: >=20 > I've been working with several ARM-based boards, and have discovered that m= any of them have "gigabit" Ethernet ports that actually cannot handle a giga= bit! (They tend to max out at around 300 Mbps; the fine print in the spec sh= eets for some of them says that this is due to "bus limitations.") Any recom= mendations for ARM-based SBCs or project computers that have at least one (a= nd preferably 2 or more) true gigabit Ethernet ports? >=20 > --Brett Glass >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?07D27DD7-2434-4A2E-91CE-A05D12BBAC2A>