Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 19:34:04 -0400 From: Adam McLaurin <blueeskimo@gmx.net> To: Charles Howse <chowse@charter.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Ports vs. Packages Message-ID: <1061249644.14034.27.camel@jake> In-Reply-To: <014201c365e0$03437ca0$04fea8c0@moe> References: <014201c365e0$03437ca0$04fea8c0@moe>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-T8q57mMp/yoKC48glb6C Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 19:25, Charles Howse wrote: > Will doing it that way require all the compiling?=20 No, packages are pre-compiled. Note that you'll sometimes have to wait a li= ttle longer to get the updated packages, since the maintainer has to submit= a compiled binary, but doesn't always do so immediately after a port is up= dated. --=20 Adam McLaurin <blueeskimo@gmx.net> --=-T8q57mMp/yoKC48glb6C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/QWJst+DSc2Q4lGYRAtI7AJ4hAsDEwYg3vUUavrnKapK8/7ADjwCgxu5f wVLC6uP22KBLXuhmmiHISTs= =y06c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-T8q57mMp/yoKC48glb6C--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1061249644.14034.27.camel>