Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:09:13 +0200 From: wishmaster <artemrts@ukr.net> To: Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: Advice/guidance requested. Message-ID: <1389516744.523477025.przufqea@frv34.ukr.net> In-Reply-To: <1389491895.26149.69590497.27B13D4C@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <52D1A7D5.32720.65E995@g8kbvdave.gmail.com> <1389491895.26149.69590497.27B13D4C@webmail.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Original message --- From: "Mark Felder" <feld@freebsd.org> Date: 12 January 2014, 03:58:27 > I would also recommend ezjails. Using fat jails is often completely > unnecessary. Do you think using ezjail you will obtain "thin" jails? You are wrong. Setup 5...10 jails for applications: one jail for web-applications on php, one for java and so on. And you will see how your jails will be FAT! And now imagine update system and software procedure. So, if you need a lot of "light" isolation containers, ezjail is not your way. I use self written scripts which creates one base system with all needed packages and a lot of "containers" with vnet supports and with "security in mind". Upgrading is very easy, just one jail.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1389516744.523477025.przufqea>