Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 May 2010 21:11:10 +0930
From:      "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
To:        Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>
Cc:        freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: AppleTalk status
Message-ID:  <13F8E068-61AE-4670-86B8-B09C3BC00B86@gsoft.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <7DB9656A-44DF-4A37-B9A4-652451234FEE@lassitu.de>
References:  <7DB9656A-44DF-4A37-B9A4-652451234FEE@lassitu.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 25/05/2010, at 20:55, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> I'm working on updating net/netatalk to version 2.1 (or 2.1.1 when =
that comes out the next couple of days), and I'm wondering what state =
AppleTalk support is in these days.  Is anybody still using it, or would =
now be the time to make all AppleTalk support in that port optional, and =
just focus on the file server component?
>=20
> I haven't used AppleTalk for at least eight years now, and I don't =
quite see which setting it still would be used in nowadays...

I use it so I can back my Macbook Pro to my FreeBSD server on a ZFS =
partition..
(But that is all)

--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C









Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13F8E068-61AE-4670-86B8-B09C3BC00B86>