Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 21:37:49 +0300 From: Dmitry Koltsov <root@hostonfly.com> To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re[2]: Using DNAT and DNS round-robin Message-ID: <196254713265.20011209213749@hostonfly.com> In-Reply-To: <PGECILGGNJGDPJKLFEMIMEJGCIAA.dpuryear@usa.net> References: <PGECILGGNJGDPJKLFEMIMEJGCIAA.dpuryear@usa.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Configuring of round-robin under Bind is very simple. You can create as much A records as you want and you'll receive round-robin configuration. To give more exact answer I should ask you: what you are looking for? just load balancing and/or high availability? Also I think that Squid is not very good solution as minimum from your customer's point of view. We are using our own, DNS-based solution and we are happy with it. Real issue with our cluster: http://www.hostonfly.net/mrtg1705/ - no downtime as result Best regards, Dmitry Koltsov Host On Fly S.A. mailto:root@hostonfly.com Sunday, December 09, 2001, you wrote to me: DP> I forgot to mention our third option, which also appears quite viable. We DP> are looking into the use of Squid, which has virtual hosting support. Using DP> this method we can forgo DNAT entirely. Any thoughts or experience with this DP> additional method? DP> Regards, Dustin DP> --- DP> Dustin Puryear <dpuryear@usa.net> DP> Information Systems Consultant DP> http://members.telocity.com/~dpuryear DP> In the beginning the Universe was created. DP> This has been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Dustin Puryear >> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 11:47 AM >> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org >> Subject: Using DNAT and DNS round-robin >> >> >> I posted earlier concerning using FreeBSD with a web service with one >> firewall and two web servers, all running FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE. >> Basically, we >> feel that we have two solutions that would work. First, we can setup each >> web server with a series of interface aliases for each IP-based virtual >> host. Second, we could maintain a private internal network and assign each >> web IP address to be used on the firewall's public interface and then use >> DNAT to send the request to the web servers. I am thinking the second >> solution is best. >> >> Is this how most of you do this? Also, can I configure FreeBSD to use some >> type of round robin so that we can use multiple web servers? My concern is >> that when I create the routing tables the IP addresses are used >> internally, >> and not symbolic names, so specifying a hostname won't have the desire >> result even if I have DNS setup to round robin that hostname >> between several >> addresses. >> >> Any help? >> >> BTW, I may post a similar question to freebsd-questions, so you can ignore >> one of these. :) >> >> Regards, Dustin >> >> --- >> Dustin Puryear <dpuryear@usa.net> >> Information Systems Consultant >> http://members.telocity.com/~dpuryear >> In the beginning the Universe was created. >> This has been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams >> >> >> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message >> DP> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org DP> with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?196254713265.20011209213749>