Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 11:20:11 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Cc: phk@freefall.cdrom.com (Poul-Henning Kamp), mark@grondar.za, wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Crypt code summary(2). Message-ID: <199506260920.LAA12300@grumble.grondar.za>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I am going to counter Poul, and agree with Garrett, and give reasons > for doing so. ...and I am going to debate this too! > a) It is very likely to change as RFC's get done to cover this and > we will more or less be forced to rip out what ever we had done > to implement what is in the RFCs. The SSLeay code is already covered by RFC's. See rfc1421, rfc1422, rfc1423 and rfc1424. > b) This is cryto code and may have legal ramifications that none of > us have fully evaluated (and I wouldn't consider it fully evaluated > until some one has consulted with the State Department and/or an > attourny (didn't we have some one once offer us free or low cost > legal counsel??). Do US embassies have PR State Department folks I could ask? M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506260920.LAA12300>