Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 16:32:57 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami) To: adam@veda.is Cc: adam@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/rplay Makefile ports/audio/rplay/files md5 ports/audio/rplay/patches patch-aa patch-ab Message-ID: <199610092332.QAA06243@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199610092047.UAA25867@veda.is> (message from Adam David on Wed, 9 Oct 1996 20:47:21 %2B0000 (GMT))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* You must mean the "version required" comment. I am wary to change it for * subminor version numbers, since I support the view that foo-1.1b5 should * have a version_required of 1.1 rather than 1.1b5. However, since I remember * no discussion on this subject and I have not brought it up myself until now, * I left it unchanged until the policy is clear. Um, you sure bring up interesting points. But I don't see any reason why we should distinguish patchlevels. The port is for a certain distfile, and the "version required" is supposed to be the easy way to identify exactly where the port stands. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610092332.QAA06243>