Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 22:44:08 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: port of ripe's extended whois client. Message-ID: <19970617224408.ZS35095@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <19970617194227.38410@pavilion.net>; from Josef Karthauser on Jun 17, 1997 19:42:27 %2B0100 References: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970617070708.16331D-100000@nexis.net> <Pine.GSO.3.96.970617123326.26330A-100000@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> <19970617194227.38410@pavilion.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Josef Karthauser wrote: > > Perhaps the standard whois should be fixed to understand the > > extra info, then... :) > > May be.. who can say? We can say. I'd also vote for this option. If the extended options don't conflict with standard usage (so the default doesn't change for the innocent), there's no reason to have two utilities doing basically the same, one in the base system, and one in ports. The bloat is neglicible, i assume. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970617224408.ZS35095>