Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 17:03:48 +1100 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, jkh@time.cdrom.com Cc: andreas@klemm.gtn.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LINT is missing examples for sio1-3 ? GENERIC does so Message-ID: <199801060603.RAA30386@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> No. LINT is suppose to have the minimal number of entries to give an >> instance of each type. Only a few bogus entries breake this rule (grep >> for [a-z]1). > >But what about showing also different instance/flag combinations? I >don't see how it hurts to do that as separate entries if the >alternative is to muddy a single entry to the point of confusion. OK, but the proposed change just copied lines from GENERIC to give uninteresting differences in the port, irq and disable flag. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801060603.RAA30386>