Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Mar 1998 16:49:44 +0100
From:      "Christopher Martin at Home" <psycho@keyworld.net>
To:        "Greg Lehey" <grog@lemis.com>, "Ben Ostrowsky" <sylvar@afn.org>, <freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Rant: What are we?
Message-ID:  <199803281548.QAA09711@mail.keyworld.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> As you can see, it's not an easy distinction.  Sue had hoped that the
> heavies would keep off -newbies, or at least not post any messages,
> but that hasn't quite happened.  From what I've seen, there are a
> number of people active on the list who are quite experienced.  This
> may not be a bad idea: I was the person who was concerned that
> questions on -newbies would give rise to a lot of misleading or just
> downright wrong answers.  But whichever way we look at it, there's a
> differentiation problem.
> 
> Any comments?  I personally think we need to let the group develop a
> bit, and then we'll be able to decide.
> 
> Greg

Hi Greg and Folks,

I think it may be a better idea to rethink the whole question.

I for instance use the lists to keep a tab on developments and progress of
enhancements. When I do find something interesting I relay it to my
colleagues at werk. I am more involved in the business decision side of
things and as such lack the necessary hands-on practick to really get into
detail even though I have conceptual understanding of the way Unix works.

However, from what I gather in newbies, many come from non-Unix
environments and as such many of the questions would be related to their
lack of awareness of basic Unix precepts. FreeBSD is very often their first
Unix experience. Thus it is so much harder forthem to get to grips with,
jargon, references and sometimes I think even a basic idea of what is found
where unless they get hold of the FreeBSD book.

It happened to me with Novell Netware as well.

Coming back to my suggestion, I think newbies who have had Unix experience
in system administration can go directly to questions because they are not
going to be asking many of the questions newbies ask.

If on the other hand, newbie questions relate to applications for FreeBSD,
that is because they may not be aware of the compatibility issues.

I think, what should be done is that newbies should monitor questions or at
least digests.

And that experienced people should monitor newbies to give that occasional
helping hand.

It may be a good idea though to publish diagrammatic representations of the
Unix directory tree for people who are totally new to Unix and a synopsis
of what files are found where and a basic explanation of their functions:
e.g. os kernels, ports, drivers, user related stuff etc. It may also be a
good idea to give a rough explanation on similarities and differences
between the bootstrap process in Unix and DOS/Windows devices (i.e. where
the conf files come in etc.)

This could be published on the web-site and used as a basic reference for
all the newbies prior to going ahead.

Do not get the false idea that I know what I am speaking about. I stand to
be corrected or directed to a site which may already have this up for
reading.

What do you think?

Chris


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803281548.QAA09711>