Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 22:05:00 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Subject: Re: ECGS ... Message-ID: <19981102220500.A12773@nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811012301370.316-100000@thelab.hub.org>; from The Hermit Hacker on Sun, Nov 01, 1998 at 11:04:21PM -0400 References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811012301370.316-100000@thelab.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'm generally the last person to complain about a particular port, but why > is there a development version of EGCS 2.x in the ports, but not stable > version? :( Because the development version in the tree was felt to be more stable than 1.1b. As tested by me and a rather hairy C++ project by jdp. If you can tell me a newer SNAP that would be stable for you, I'll be more than happy to upgrade the port. I don't want to see two versions of EGCS in the ports collection. I want the one I maintain to be as stable as possible. (and at times that's asking a lot) > assuming that at one time there was a 1.1 stable port of EGCS, any way of > getting that un-earthed and put into ports beside the development/snapshot > version? Nope, not by me. Lets find a newer SNAP that works for you. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981102220500.A12773>