Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 03:20:44 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com Cc: motoyuki@snipe.rim.or.jp, nclayton@lehman.com, kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp, doc@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-translate@ngo.org.uk, jdp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Resolution: FDP reorganisation Message-ID: <199906251020.DAA01960@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <57461.930305624@zippy.cdrom.com> (jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) References: <57461.930305624@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> * * > So, It is NEEDLESS at all. * * Not to jump in the middle of an argument, but I should note that Nik * has presented a number of reasonable points in his message and simply * dismissing them all with a single-line reply of this nature does not, * I believe, do the poster credit. A more adequate rebuttal is called * for. Um, Konno-san clearly quoted the part of Nik's message he's arguing against, offered a two-paragraph explanation (which you omitted in your quote) why he thinks it is useless, and offered this conclusion after another quote (Nik's mini-conclusion on that point). Dismissing *that* as a "single-line reply" is indeed quite a leap in my opinion. :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906251020.DAA01960>