Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Oct 1999 15:05:41 -0400
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, "Stephen J. Roznowski" <sjr@home.net>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Vinum or CCD? (was: CCD questions)
Message-ID:  <19991029150541.17186@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <3819E1EA.83DD04B7@softweyr.com>; from Wes Peters on Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 12:05:30PM -0600
References:  <199910291212.IAA40158@cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com> <3819E1EA.83DD04B7@softweyr.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, 29 October 1999 at 12:05:30 -0600, Wes Peters wrote:
> "Stephen J. Roznowski" wrote:
>>
>> On 28 Oct, Wes Peters wrote:
>>> "Stephen J. Roznowski" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm looking at the tutorial on building CCDs at
>>>
>>> Why?  Do you have a compelling reason not to use Vinum volume manager?
>>
>> No, but why should I use Vinum over CCD? (All I want to do is create
>> some larger disks).
>
> Because Vinum is being maintained, and because Vinum will allow you to
> stripe your disks instead of simple concatenate them, which will probably
> result in better I/O rates.

In fact, CCD will stripe for you as well.  In such configurations,
there isn't much difference between CCD and Vinum performance.  That
changes a lot when you get to mirroring.

Greg
--
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991029150541.17186>