Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 09:24:33 +1000 From: "Andrew Reilly" <areilly@nsw.bigpond.net.au> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ym g <ymg@graffiti.net>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which applications are using kqueue ? Message-ID: <20000728092433.A12228@gurney.reilly.home> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007271517400.34543-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>; from kris@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 03:24:27PM -0700 References: <20000727143650.29162.qmail@graffiti.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007271517400.34543-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 03:24:27PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, ym g wrote: > > Are there plans for any apps like thin/fast [maybe in kernel] > > webserver which uses kqueue > > I've been tinkering with kq'ing thttpd - in fact I have it working (which > was trivial), although it's not optimized yet so I don't expect major > performance changes - thttpd is still querying each FD individually for > status, instead of just using the next ones kq tells it about. I just need > to figure out how to benchmark it effectively - httperf is running into > client limitations so far. The boa HTTP server might be as good a place to start too: it doesn't fork either (except to run CGI scripts). Actually, thttpd sounds pretty similar. I hadn't looked at it before. Have you compared them at all? -- Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000728092433.A12228>