Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 14:23:54 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com> To: John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> Cc: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, rob <europax@home.com>, Johannes Zwart <johannes@jak.nl>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why not XEmacs, after all? Message-ID: <20000902142354.A20066@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009021317320.22061-100000@inconnu.isu.edu>; from "John Galt" on Sat Sep 2 13:20:42 GMT 2000 References: <14767.55635.361083.677034@guru.mired.org> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009021317320.22061-100000@inconnu.isu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Sep 02), John Galt said: > But lynx is deprecated--I had to compile it from source on my 4.0 > machine (but I also got the added benefit of getting the bleeding > edge features this way...) Lynx is not deprecated. w3m certainly doesn't compete with it in terms of features or ease of use yet. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@emsphone.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000902142354.A20066>