Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 03:18:43 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Subject: Re: gensetdefs using sh(1),sed(1),grep(1) and awk(1) Message-ID: <20001220031843.O19572@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <200012201057.LAA64230@freebsd.dk>; from sos@freebsd.dk on Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:57:31AM %2B0100 References: <xzpg0jjnzkc.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <200012201057.LAA64230@freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> [001220 02:53] wrote: > It seems Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> writes: > > > No it does not, I stand with David here, get that perl crap out of > > > the kernel build, its hard to maintain (impossible if you didn't > > > write it yourself not too long ago) and we shouldn't need perl to > > > build the kernel, period. > > > > Stop parroting idiotic and false anti-Perl-bigot FUD. Learn to use the > > language properly, and open your eyes and look at the Perl code that's > > actually in the tree (vnode_if.pl, for instance). > > Oh my god, take a chill pill will ya ? > > I'm just stating _my_ opinion here, you can do the same... > > Anyhow its a moot point, -current is so fragile its hard to use anyways... I'm not sure what you mean by fragile, I'm not exactly stressing my boxes, but except for a single reboot, my machines have been fine. 3:14AM up 7 days, 1:31, 3 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Dec 13 01:38:43 -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001220031843.O19572>