Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:15:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Subject: Re: KSE threading support (first parts) Message-ID: <200104270015.f3R0FAi62512@earth.backplane.com> References: <3AE71067.FF4BD029@elischer.org> <20010425110940.L1790@fw.wintelcom.net> <3AE85776.92D6BD90@elischer.org> <20010426120630.A92915@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:Uh people. : :We really, really NEED to agree on the design here. Jason's paper :(http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/refs/freebsd_kse/freebsd_kse.html) is :explains all this. : :Before any more work is done on KSE's I really feel people should either :agree fully with the paper, or debate its contents first. : :I really doubt a single person will develop KSE, so it is imperative :there is a common sheet of music. : :-- :-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) I've read it. I was under the impression from prior discussions that KSEs belonging to the same process had to be serialized... that you couldn't run them concurrently with each other. I can't imagine how we could possibly run KSEs belonging to the same process concurrently anyway. I think I prefer the original rfork()/KSE model. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104270015.f3R0FAi62512>