Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Aug 2001 21:14:26 +0100
From:      setantae <setantae@submonkey.net>
To:        Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: chroot'ing named(8)
Message-ID:  <20010819211426.A689@rhadamanth>
In-Reply-To: <001c01c1281a$06987500$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>; from tedm@toybox.placo.com on Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 12:14:38PM -0700
References:  <20010817122110.A11537@rhadamanth> <001c01c1281a$06987500$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 12:14:38PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> One thing you might consider is that espically with nameservices, that
> you really ought to be running the nameserver on a box that is completely
> separate from all your other systems.  If the DNS goes away then the
> entire network is junk.  By contrast failure of any other single server
> won't take the network with it.
> 
> Also, Internet regulations require a total of two nameservers, on separate
> networks.  IMHO both should be protected by an access list on your border
> routers that blocks off all ports not needed.  On top of that you should be
> backing up the bind files regularly, and for all public servers you should
> be following the patch notifications every day.  If you do all or most of this
> then I think you will find that the need for running named in a sandbox is
> greatly alleviated.

Sorry, Ted but I fail to see how your reply addresses even one of the
concerns raised in my original mail.

I'm perfectly aware of the concept of a dedicated server and I do know the
RFCs (I'm hostmaster for an ISP here in the UK).

My point was that although I know how to do it, it's not documented anywhere,
the steps in the handbook will not result in a working secondary nameserver,
and it could be a lot easier.
Also, the steps required are now available in the archives for this list.

Are you saying that an extra layer of security is pointless, so chroot'ing
named _should_ be hard ?

Ceri

-- 
keep a mild groove on

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010819211426.A689>