Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Brian Whalen <bri@sonicboom.org>
To:        David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>
Cc:        <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Intel-for-Gateway2000 10/100 fxp problems 
Message-ID:  <20010926201806.B66729-100000@cx175057-a.ocnsd1.sdca.home.com>
In-Reply-To: <200109270229.f8R2T8w27732@grumpy.dyndns.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I guess it wouldn't hurt to see, I just wanted to make sure you either
reran /stand/sysinstall for the new card or edited /etc/rc.conf.

Brian "Sonic" Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity


On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, David Kelly wrote:

> Brian Whalen writes:
> > does ifconfig actually list its allegedly applied ip address??
>
> Yup. Along with sane MAC address, netmask, broadcast, and media. Media
> is correctly reported and correctly changes when plugged into a 10baseT
> hub, or into a 10/100 switch. Would be happy to copy/paste a copy for
> everyone's second opinion but the machine is 17 miles away tonight and
> I didn't leave a wire plugged into an Intel port. With that said, this
> is one without a cable plugged into the fxp0:
>
> fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         inet 192.168.100.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.100.255
>         ether 00:03:47:0c:64:44
>         media: Ethernet autoselect (none)
>         status: no carrier
> xl0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         inet 10.0.0.73 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 255.255.255.0
>         ether 00:c0:4f:86:26:7b
>         media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP)
>         status: active
>
> xl0 is getting its config from an NT server's dhcp. What the heck gives
> with that broadcast address? That's awful. Have to look into it
> tomorrow. Good old FreeBSD works anyhow.
>
> DHCP works on the xl0 interface but not on the fxp0.
>
> Have found a utility at http://www.intel.com/ for disabling the Intel
> Network Boot Manager stuff. Genuine Intel card in my home machine works
> but has version 2.1 or 2.2 of the Intel ROM (not going to reboot to find
> out), problem Gateway brand cards have 2.6. Intel website says
> 4.0.something is current...
>
> I suspect anything which runs before FreeBSD gets a shot at the chip.
>
> --
> David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net
> =====================================================================
> The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its
> capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010926201806.B66729-100000>