Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 10:06:45 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille <marc@blackend.org> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/38777: In articles 4.x, 3.x should be 4.X and 3.X Message-ID: <20020601100645.A83563@abigail.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <200205312300.g4VN05k12623@freefall.freebsd.org>; from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr on Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:00:05PM -0700 References: <200205312300.g4VN05k12623@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:00:05PM -0700, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > In articles 4.x, 3.x should be 4.X and 3.X > > Read the patch below for more details. > > Is this really necessary? > hehe, well nothing is indispensable. The *current* convention is 4.X instead of 4.x, i'm currently correcting that in my freebsd-fr work, so i *propagate* that on the original tree :) > > Apart from increasing the size of the RCS foo,v files > that are kept in the repository, why would this need > to be changed? :P I never saw corrections in that way, i wasn't aware of that size problem, sorry. Well i have a bunch of unsubmitted PRs *laying around* : punctuation, convention, minor errors etc... docs can live without them, so i will not submit them. It will reduce my *traffic*, and i will only focus on the freebsd-fr cvsrepo. Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020601100645.A83563>