Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:06:01 -0400 From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> To: Joseph Scott <joseph@randomnetworks.com> Cc: Ollivier Robert <roberto@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/apr-devel Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-install pkg-plist ports/devel/apr-devel/files patch-apr-Makefile.in Message-ID: <20020716190600.GC2767@electricjellyfish.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207161121370.71380-100000@pebkac.owp.csus.edu> References: <200207151811.g6FIBRvv083829@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207161121370.71380-100000@pebkac.owp.csus.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 11:22:25AM -0700, Joseph Scott wrote: > Does this change, or deal with PR ports/39091 (mv *-config to > libdir to coexist with apr-devel)? i was unaware of that pr, but unfortunately no, it does not solve the problem. you still can't have apr and apache2 installed on the same box (ironic, isn't it!). a new version of apache2 is being rolled soon, so when it hits the ports tree i'll look at making it possible to have apache2 use the ports tree version of apr, but until then it's not possible. as for moving apr-config and apu-config to lib/apache2 for the apache2 port, that's something that should be taken up with the maintainer. i don't see anything wrong with the idea though. on the other hand, perhaps we should think about just hacking the apache2 port to just not install it's version of apr-config and apu-config? -garrett -- garrett rooney Remember, any design flaw you're rooneg@electricjellyfish.net sufficiently snide about becomes http://electricjellyfish.net/ a feature. -- Dan Sugalski To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020716190600.GC2767>