Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 16:33:14 +0100 From: Udo Erdelhoff <ue@nathan.ruhr.de> To: Thomas Moestl <tmm@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sparc64/ebus ebus.c src/sys/sparc64/include ofw_bus.h ver.h src/sys/sparc64/isa isa.c src/sys/sparc64/pci ofw_pci.c ofw_pci.h psycho.c src/sys/sparc64/sparc64 machdep.c ofw_bus.c Message-ID: <20021109153314.GX59222@nathan.ruhr.de> In-Reply-To: <200211071607.gA7G7kXF023424@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200211071607.gA7G7kXF023424@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 08:07:46AM -0800, Thomas Moestl wrote: > Add two new workaround for firmware anomalies: > 1. At least some Netra t1 models have PCI buses with no associated > interrupt map, but obviously expect the PCI swizzle to be done with > the interrupt number from the higher level as intpin. Is this perhaps a side effect of the hardware difference between the older Netra t1 100/105 and the newer Netra t1 AC/DC 200? I have used both models at work and the differences are significant. Starting with with CPU: Netra t1 105: SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cEngine Netra t1 AC 200: SUNW,UltraAX-i2 Holler if you need addtional data as long it is available from inside Solaris - I cannot take these boxes down. /s/Udo -- I have the heart of an innocent child -- in a small jar on my desk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021109153314.GX59222>