Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Dec 2002 16:35:11 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Gavin Atkinson <gavin@ury.york.ac.uk>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        sparc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: High 'system' load
Message-ID:  <20021222163055.S61142-100000@ury.york.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20021222162635.GA19974@rot13.obsecurity.org>
References:  <20021222142731.U61142-100000@ury.york.ac.uk> <20021222162635.GA19974@rot13.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> 1.96 is not "massively high", it indicates that two processes are
> waiting to run (as expected in this situation).

You actually snipped the line I was querying. I was not talking about the
load averages, but the actual percentage of load which is credited to
'system':

CPU states: 22.0% user,  0.0% nice, 55.1% system,  0.9% interrupt, 22.0% idle

This does seem excessively high to me.

> As for top, you'd expect it to measure its own CPU usage during the
> period in which it is sampling, since it is actually running during that
> time.  It doesn't mean that it's using a constant 27% of your CPU.

I understand that, but even on my P75 -current pentium system, top only
accounts for 5% cpu load while running the same test.

Gavin

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021222163055.S61142-100000>