Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 22:43:22 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> Subject: Re: misc/44148: installworld in 4.7-STABLE does not installIPFilter related header files Message-ID: <20030425221643.X38215@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20030425062247.GE32731@sunbay.com> References: <20030424192427.GA71112@sunbay.com> <200304250554.PAA03475@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au> <20030425062247.GE32731@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 03:54:32PM +1000, Darren Reed wrote: > > In some email I received from Ruslan Ermilov, sie wrote: > > > > Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE > > -- Start of PGP signed section. > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 04:18:45AM +1000, Darren Reed wrote: > > > > In some email I received from Ruslan Ermilov, sie wrote: > > > > > In the SHARED=symlinks case, /usr/include/netinet is > > > > > the symlink to /usr/src/sys/netinet. Hope this now > > > > > makes more sense. > > > > > > > > Is there any reason to not create a real /usr/include/netinet > > > > and then populate _that_ directory with symbolic links to each > > > > of the files, individually ? This should preserve the semantics > > > > of what "symlinks" is about. Much as I dislike symlink farms, I think this would work OK (the same as symlinks from individual headers in the top level of /usr/include to various places in the src tree). > > > We could create /usr/include/contrib/ipfilter/netinet, and > > > that will be consistent with kern.pre.mk. Those that need > > > it would just add -I/usr/include/contrib/ipfilter. How is > > > this? Doesn't seem any better. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030425221643.X38215>