Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 14:47:02 +0000 From: Nuno Teixeira <nunotex@pt-quorum.com> To: Dung Patrick <dkt@digitalme.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: my experience with the SCHED_ULE Message-ID: <20030426144701.GA5900@gw.tex.bogus> In-Reply-To: <1051362553.c8e66a40dkt@digitalme.com> References: <1051362553.c8e66a40dkt@digitalme.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 09:09:13PM +0800, Dung Patrick wrote: > Hi, > > My PC is an PIII SMP. I have been using the SCHED_4BSD (with ADAPTIVE_MUTEX) with 5-Current for some time. Now I have tried the SCHED_ULE (with ADAPTIVE_MUTEX). > > I have tried some real world applications like Mozilla, xmms, and run inside KDE. The performance is about the same with SCHED_4BSD. But I could notice a little bit slow down/delay when I switch to another process. For example: use the mouse to press the menu bar of konsole and drag it. I could see a small delay before the window moves. > > Finally, I would appreicate all the developers for their time and effort on freebsd. > > Regards, > Patrick > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi, A few days ago I tried too SCHED_ULE sheduler and the first thing that I noticed is that when I run my PII 300 at high load (cvs, compiling programs, mozilla, etc) my mouse fails a lot its precision. I recompile the same kernel with old sheduler and it fixed mouse problem. Bye, Nuno Teixeira -- /* PGP fingerprint: C6D1 06ED EB54 A99C 6B14 6732 0A5D 810D 727D F6C6 */
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030426144701.GA5900>