Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 13:29:47 -0700 From: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Making a dynamically-linked root Message-ID: <20030602202947.GE87863@roark.gnf.org> In-Reply-To: <xzp4r3844eb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20030602171942.GA87863@roark.gnf.org> <xzp4r3844eb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--YvpLBQJFkgiI+gkH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:21:16PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> writes: > > There will be a performance hit associated with this. I did a quick > > measurement at boot and my boot time (from invocation of /etc/rc to > > the login prompt) went from 12 seconds with a static root to 15 > > seconds with a dynamic root. I have yet to perform a worldstone on > > it. >=20 > Was /bin/sh dynamically linked? It shouldn't be. Why shouldn't it be dynamically linked? I'd like to be able to use ~username expansion via nss_ldap. -gordon --YvpLBQJFkgiI+gkH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+27O7Ru2t9DV9ZfsRAjikAKCP9D3g7SHP/gGcZrB+t2/+nvAKSwCgiJhC QyWE4/qb0f6KMb5Goz1Jx18= =SLcO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YvpLBQJFkgiI+gkH--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030602202947.GE87863>