Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:53:37 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely8.cicely.de> To: Maxim Mazurok <maxim@km.ua> Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: additional com-port Message-ID: <20030613235336.GF7279@cicely8.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20030613233057.GM338@km.ua> References: <20030613210519.GH338@km.ua> <20030613224912.GB7279@cicely8.cicely.de> <20030613225959.GI338@km.ua> <20030613230232.GJ338@km.ua> <20030613232116.GC7279@cicely8.cicely.de> <20030613233057.GM338@km.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 02:30:57AM +0300, Maxim Mazurok wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:21:16AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > > >What is wrong with the second onboard serial? > >You just have to remove the flags which declare it to be a special > >debug interface for to kernel. > >See sio(4) manpage for details on flags. > > hmmm > sio2 - it's no traditional com-port > it's ISA Cisco router console (cisco AP-EC) > i no need second onboard com-port, but i need access to cisco console And you can't just give it another IRQ? Cisco should know that IRQ 3 and 4 are typically in use. > if i deactivated sio1 in SRM, change settings of cisco console to IO_COM2 > and irq 3, can i use next kernel config for worked serial console to freebsd > and worked console to cisco: > > device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 irq 4 > device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 irq 3 > ? Yes - that should work. > and one more: now console to server connected to second com-port on > board(upper). it's right? Sorry - I can't follow you here. The console is always on sio0, which is the upper one on PC164, so I asume it's also upper on PC164SX. The lower port needs to be disabled so you can reuse it's IRQ. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030613235336.GF7279>