Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:47:41 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with latest bind9 setup changes Message-ID: <20041002084741.GA55948@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <200410021033.37844.freebsd@redesjm.local> References: <200410021033.37844.freebsd@redesjm.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jose, On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 10:33:37AM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > I'm running named in a sandwitch config form: > named_flags=3D"-u bind -c /var/named/named.conf >=20 > After my last update, I've got my /var/named/ dir polluted by a chroot se= tup. > I think this is not the way. >=20 > /etc/rc.d/named must do this from chroot_autoupdate() only when required = to do=20 > so. >=20 > If /var/named must became a system directory, I can move my config=20 > to /var/namebd or so. But I like to read HEADS UP about those things. >=20 There was a HEADS up message sent to the current@ mailing list. There is also a relevant entry in src/UPDATING, "20040928". Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXmstqRfpzJluFF4RAkolAKCYw9qfOq3Yvayc3krxzgKXy3R4GgCffe8u yEaIEnrR0BInhT2fZgV5ILM= =Fpsg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041002084741.GA55948>