Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:02:42 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 is coming too fast Message-ID: <20050425010242.GA44110@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050424204611.072105a0@64.7.153.2> References: <20050424175543.71041.qmail@web51805.mail.yahoo.com> <20050424151517.O68772@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <3822.216.177.243.38.1114385370.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <20050425000459.GA28667@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.0.20050424204611.072105a0@64.7.153.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:54:00PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 08:04 PM 24/04/2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > >> Performance in other areas seems to be lagging as well. > > > >Since you were wrong about the above, I have to ask whether you have > >evidence of this. >=20 > There was a lengthy discussion along with bonnie, dd, postmark and iozone= =20 > results discussed in January on the freebsd-performance list that=20 > illustrate the disk io difference between RELENG_4 and RELENG_5 at the ti= me. >=20 > I also tried a CURRENT snapshot then and there wasn't much of a differenc= e=20 > between it and RELENG_5. disk I/O or filesystem I/O? It would be interesting to benchmark the latter since all the recent VFS work. Kris --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCbEGxWry0BWjoQKURAropAKCHnQBq4McxN6HwWsmSRaFdvW2u1gCfZjSL yvDLA6Ov8aB/8KinY5PSz8g= =hYKy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050425010242.GA44110>