Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 15:48:41 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: wi0 is always status: no carrier Message-ID: <200505271548.42926.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200505221724.05548.kirk@strauser.com> References: <200505122236.14490.kirk@strauser.com> <20941475b4d98a8a9743a4a7ce85a577@FreeBSD.org> <200505221724.05548.kirk@strauser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 22 May 2005 06:24 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Friday 20 May 2005 10:20 pm, John Baldwin wrote: > > I have a patch to make the PIR code trust the BIOS in this case over the > > $PIR table that you can test if you want. Actually, I committed the > > patch finally a while ago. It is rev 1.117 in HEAD. It should backport > > to 5.x directly. Try that and see if it fixes your problem. > > I wiped the drive and started over with a new install. Then, I applied > your patch and rebooted into the new kernel. My dmesg output was identical > between the two kernels (save for the normal little things like minor skew > in clock rates). Pardon my ignorance, but should I be somehow requesting > that my cbb device get bound to IRQ 11 instead of 10? There's no line > containing "cbb" in /boot/device.hints; should I add one? The patch should change the IRQ numbers and also print out a line about how it is trusting your BIOS over the $PIR, so I think you didn't backport the patch correctly or boot the patched kernel somehow. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200505271548.42926.jhb>