Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 3 Nov 2005 02:08:51 +0200 (EET)
From:      Vladimir Kushnir <vkushnir@i.kiev.ua>
To:        Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: CURRENT + amd64 + user-ppp = panic
Message-ID:  <20051103020404.J85422@kushnir1.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <200511030059.05946.max@love2party.net>
References:  <20051027022313.R675@kushnir1.kiev.ua> <200511021035.22990.max@love2party.net> <20051103001509.C85422@kushnir1.kiev.ua> <200511030059.05946.max@love2party.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Max Laier wrote:

>>
>> Here it is: right before panic it prints
>>
>> For 0xffffff0017531100 -1 ticks
>> For 0xffffff0017531100 -1 ticks
>
> This results in two consecutive callout_stop() calls, but shouldn't hurt as
> callout_stop is protected against that.
>
> Do you get a dump for this?  Can you compare this pointer to the global
> llinfo_nd6 and see if "c" from the softclock() frame is related (or maybe the
> previous item in the list TAILQ).
>

Sorry I'm not very goot at debugging. Would you please give me some 
instructions (lamer's level, preferably :-)). And anyway I'll be able to 
do it tomorrow only.

TIA,
Vladimir



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051103020404.J85422>