Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:18:31 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: tobez@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) Message-ID: <20060306101831.GA21025@tara.freenix.org> In-Reply-To: <863bhwvtrh.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <20060304141957.14716.qmail@web32705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060304152433.W61086@fledge.watson.org> <BA422F74-E7F9-4F53-9A88-B89E2255FF00@behanna.org> <200603051930.25957.peter@wemm.org> <863bhwvtrh.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Dag-Erling Smrgrav: > svk is not an alternative to svn, it's an svn client. As far as I understand svk, it is more than "just a svn client". It uses some of the svn layers (file system, remote access for example) but add layers of its own for the distributed/decentralised concept. If it is just as way to replicate a svn repo, work on it and get the csets back to the main one, then it could be useful but it would not be a full dVCS. Anton in Cc:, he is the one pushing me to try svk for months :) -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr Darwin snuadh.freenix.org Kernel Version 7.9.0: Wed Mar 30 20:11:17 PST 2005
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060306101831.GA21025>