Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:23:35 -0300 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: NUMA and Dual-Core Support Message-ID: <200603130823.35433.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <2fd864e0603130300m12a02932tb82c3c5fa4ac1973@mail.gmail.com> References: <60F1B0FC76F1504A91839905DA7EBDB603903C@ssuzexmb3.amd.com> <2fd864e0603130256l52f5b0aoa5e2a4c720aa3e10@mail.gmail.com> <2fd864e0603130300m12a02932tb82c3c5fa4ac1973@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 13 March 2006 08:00, Astrodog wrote: > > I am (As I get time) working on adding some NUMA awareness to ULE. > Mostly, this effort isn`t focused on real NUMA installations, but on > optimizing FreeBSD for use with Opterons where there is a penalty for > accessing remote memory (Attached to another socket). After discussing > it with some people though.... it appears to be the same project, just > different weighting in memory allocation and scheduling > Is the memory access with dual-core (not HT) the the same as with=20 dual-processores? Would NUMA have any impact on dual-cores? Since you touched ULE, do you think using ULE on dual-core would have some= =20 benefit? Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603130823.35433.joao>