Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:48:18 -0300 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com>, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Subject: Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?] Message-ID: <200603271848.19010.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20060327185142.GC24315@soaustin.net> References: <20060324223317.2069564f@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <200603271215.56344.joao@matik.com.br> <20060327185142.GC24315@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 27 March 2006 15:51, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 12:15:55PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > > well, the actual driver is trash and unusable and overall crashes SMP > > systems ... so more testing to see if it crashes more? ;) > > As with any other software development project, you have to draw a line > somewhere and say "these things will be in the release and these things > will not be in the release"; otherwise, you will never have a release at > all. > > I am not familiar with the code in this case but if its inclusion changed > enough other things in the system where _everything_ had to be re-tested > then it's not worth the regression. > > These are just the simple facts of (any) software development. > well, ok that is completly understandable basicly but this driver is unusable since dec/jan for me, for others probably longe= r=20 IMO it would make sense to be replaced by Pyuns driver because the original= is=20 not functional kind of strange getting a new release with a known not functional driver Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603271848.19010.joao>